• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • More News ⌄
    • SatNews
    • SatMagazine
    • MilSatMagazine
  • Events ⌄
    • MilSat Symposium
    • SmallSat Symposium
    • Satellite Innovation
  • Contacts
  • SUBSCRIPTION

SmallSat News

You are here: Home / Archives for Featured

Featured

SmallSat Europe Speaker Focus: Daniel Metzler, Isar Aerospace

April 14, 2026 by Nick Warfield

Isar Aerospace’s Spectrum rocket flew for 30 seconds on its first launch from Andøya Spaceport on March 30, 2025, before the flight termination system activated and ended the attempt short of orbit. It was enough: the 28-meter vehicle made Isar Aerospace the first private company to launch an orbital-class rocket from continental Europe, and in the year since, CEO Daniel Metzler has converted that half-minute of flight into an ESA launch manifest, a second test flight, and over €400 million in lifetime funding.

Metzler was 25 when he co-founded Isar Aerospace in 2018 with Josef Fleischmann and Markus Brandl. All three came out of the Technical University of Munich, where Metzler had led a 40-person student rocketry team at TU Munich’s WARR research group and served as an advisor to the ESA Director General. The company now employs more than 400 people across five international locations and manufactures roughly 95% of the Spectrum vehicle in-house. Funding has come in stages: over €220 million in the Series C alone, with the NATO Innovation Fund joining as an investor in 2024.

Look at the manifest that materialized after a 30-second flight. ESA signed a launch services contract in December 2025 for the Syndeo-3 mission: 10 European experiments to orbit in the fourth quarter of 2026. Two more missions came through ESA’s Flight Ticket Initiative, an Infinite Orbits debris-servicing demonstration and an Isispace cubesat deployment, plus launch agreements with SEOPS and R-Space through ESA’s Marketplace program. In January 2026, Isar Aerospace announced its second Spectrum test flight from Andøya, dubbed “Onward and Upward,” carrying six payloads including five commercial and educational cubesats.

The broader context sharpens the stakes. Smallsat launch prices are rising because competitors keep stalling on the pad, a paradox SatNews documented at the 2026 SmallSat Symposium. Europe’s position is more precarious still: sovereign access to space is a stated strategic priority, Ariane 6 serves a different market segment, and no European micro-launcher has delivered a commercial payload to orbit. Five companies. One deadline. Isar Aerospace is among those selected for ESA’s European Launcher Challenge, which requires an orbital demonstration by 2027.

At SmallSat Europe, Metzler speaks in a standalone slot while Chief Commercial Officer Stella Guillen joins a panel on “Launch Options for Europe’s SmallSat Economy” with Exolaunch’s Jeanne Allarie, PLD Space’s Oier Rodriguez, Avio’s Xavier Lansel, and Wilson Sonsini’s Curt Blake. The panel’s central tension is real: Europe’s institutions want sovereign launch, but sovereign launch requires institutional volume commitments that have not arrived.

That tension follows Metzler to the stage. Thirty seconds of flight proved the vehicle works. The second flight will determine whether it reaches orbit. What no single flight can answer is whether Europe’s customers will book enough missions to keep the companies building these rockets solvent long enough to serve them.

Filed Under: Featured, Uncategorized

Smallsats Dominate 2025 Launch Landscape as Mass Efficiency Peaks

April 12, 2026 by donmcgee

The global satellite industry underwent a significant structural shift in 2025, as compact designs solidified their dominance over orbital manifestos. According to data released by analysis firm BryceTech covering the 2025 activity cycle, satellites weighing less than 1,200 kg—classified as smallsats—accounted for 98% of all spacecraft launched.

Record-Breaking Volume and Upmass Efficiency

The sheer volume of hardware entering orbit highlighted a mature deployment pipeline for commercial constellations. In the second quarter of 2025, a total of 1,198 spacecraft were launched globally. Of these, smallsats represented 98% of the count and an unprecedented 87% of the total upmass, which reached approximately 743,770 kg.

The trend continued through the third quarter, with 1,044 spacecraft launched. While the total number of deployments dipped slightly, the ratio remained consistent: 98% of spacecraft were under the 1,200 kg threshold, representing 86% of the 616,301 kg launched in that period.

Commercial Connectivity Driving Demand

The majority of these missions were operated by commercial entities, with communications satellites serving as the primary driver. This surge was largely sustained by the continued rapid deployment of the Starlink constellation, which remains the high-water mark for high-cadence, small-form-factor satellite production.

This shift toward smallsats reflects a broader industry move away from the “exquisite” large-bus architectures of previous decades toward resilient, proliferated constellations in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). By utilizing standardized components and frequent launch windows, operators are achieving shorter refresh cycles and higher system-wide availability.

Future Outlook

As the industry moves through 2026, the focus is shifting from pure deployment volume to the long-term sustainability of these massive constellations. Analysts suggest that while the 98% smallsat ratio may hold, the next phase of market evolution will involve managing orbital congestion and the regulatory hurdles associated with increased debris mitigation requirements.

Filed Under: Featured, Uncategorized

Defense Economics and the European SmallSat Market

March 27, 2026 by satnews

BY: Nick David, Editorial Lead, Satnews

Europe is the only major space power building its smallsat sector on defense procurement rather than venture capital or state industrial policy. EU defense spending hit €343 billion in 2024, anchor programs like IRIS² and GOVSATCOM are delivering contracted demand, and Germany alone committed €35 billion to space security. The execution gap remains real: no European smallsat launcher has reached orbit. But the demand signal is institutional, not speculative, and that changes the math.

The Structural Erosion

Europe’s upstream space market share: 21% in 2008. Six percent in 2024. That is not a decline. That is a structural collapse.

Within the accessible market, excluding mega-constellations and government-captive launches that European primes were never going to win, the share dropped from a 60% average to 33%. Two-thirds of global upstream is now structurally inaccessible to European manufacturers. The ESA Space Economy Report laid this out in 2025 with unusual candor for an institutional document.

Europe’s Upstream Market Share Collapse

21%

2008

18%

2012

14%

2016

9%

2020

6%

2024

Accessible market share: 60% → 33%

Excl. mega-constellations & captive launches. Starlink accounted for 70% of total mass launched in 2024. Source: ESA Space Economy Report 2025. Europe managed three orbital launches in 2024.

The cause is not a mystery. Starlink accounted for 70% of total mass launched in 2024. SpaceX has reshaped the launch market so thoroughly that the relevant question is no longer who competes with Ariane but who competes with Falcon 9. Europe managed three orbital launches last year. Three.

The old European model, Ariane launchers serving a commercial GEO market that no longer exists at scale, is arithmetically dead. GEO orders have cratered. The customers Arianespace built its business around are migrating to LEO or buying rides on SpaceX. The maiden launch of the Ariane 64 in February was an emotional milestone, but even its architects acknowledge it arrived into a market SpaceX has already remade.

So the question becomes: what replaces it?

The Defense Catalyst

The answer, increasingly, is defense.

EU defense spending hit €343 billion in 2024, a 19% year-over-year increase. The European Defence Agency projects €381 billion in 2025, exceeding 2% of GDP for the first time in the bloc’s history. This is the 10th consecutive year of increases. The trajectory is structural, driven by the war in Ukraine and the recognition that European security cannot rest on American political continuity.

EU Defense Spending Trajectory

’16

’17

’18

’19

’20

’21

’22

↑

€343B

’24

€381B

’25E

▲ POST-UKRAINE SURGE

ReArm Europe (Readiness 2030): €800B mobilization target

€650B fiscal flexibility + €150B SAFE loan instrument. Legislative framework published. 10th consecutive year of increases. Germany committed €35B over five years specifically for space security — equivalent to ESA’s entire budget.

The scale of the commitment keeps escalating. The Readiness 2030 initiative, branded ReArm Europe by the European Commission in March 2025, aims to mobilize €800 billion: €650 billion in fiscal flexibility measures plus a €150 billion SAFE loan instrument. The legislative framework is already published.

Space is a direct beneficiary. Germany committed €35 billion over five years specifically for space security. That figure is equivalent to ESA’s entire budget. The money targets new satellite constellations for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, communications, and early warning, including a flagship SATCOM Stage 4 constellation of over 100 LEO satellites.

European Defense-Space Complex · By the Numbers

€343B

EU defense spending in 2024, a 19% year-over-year increase

€35B

Germany’s five-year commitment specifically for space security programs

€800B

ReArm Europe mobilization target: fiscal flexibility plus SAFE loans

10

Consecutive years of EU defense spending increases — trajectory is structural

This is where the European path diverges from the American and Chinese models.

Three Models of SmallSat Development

Venture Capital

UNITED STATES

Extraordinary scale and velocity.

Also produced SPACs, bankruptcies, and companies that burned through billions before finding sustainable demand.

Astra. Virgin Orbit. The wreckage is recent.

State Industrial

CHINA

Massive capacity.

Also geopolitically isolated, increasingly sanctioned, and inaccessible to the commercial West as a launch or manufacturing partner.

Capacity exists. Access does not.

Defense Procurement

EUROPE

Contracted, institutional demand

backed by sovereign treasuries. The money survives elections, market corrections, and funding droughts.

Tax revenue, not LP distributions.

When the European Defence Agency commits to a constellation program, that commitment runs for a decade.

The Anchor Programs

Two programs demonstrate the model in practice. One is under construction. One is operational.

IRIS²

The Infrastructure for Resilience, Interconnectivity, and Security by Satellite is the EU’s sovereign connectivity constellation. The contract: €10.6 billion over 12 years, signed in Brussels in December 2024. The SpaceRISE consortium (SES, Eutelsat, Hispasat) will build and operate 290 satellites across multiple orbits. Commissioner Kubilius is targeting 2029 for initial services. Realistic expectation is 2030.

The honest assessment: IRIS² has problems. Quilty Space has flagged competing national interests within the consortium, a confused identity relative to Starlink, and underwhelming capacity projections. These are not minor objections.

The counterargument concedes every flaw. Europe is building IRIS² anyway, because the alternative is unacceptable. Full dependency on Starlink for sovereign communications is a risk no European defense ministry will tolerate after watching how quickly commercial services can be restricted, denied, or politicized in a crisis. IRIS² is insurance priced at €10.6 billion. The consortium has already initiated its industrial procurement phase, publishing RFPs for 272 LEO satellites and launch services.

European Sovereign Space Architecture

IRIS²

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

€10.6B over 12 years

SpaceRISE: SES, Eutelsat, Hispasat

272 LEO + 18 MEO • Target: 2029–30

GOVSATCOM

LIVE

Operational Jan 14, 2026 • 5 nations

8 satellites • Cyprus completed first operational use Mar 2026

GALILEO

OPERATIONAL

30 satellites • GNSS constellation

Foundation of European space shield architecture

IRIS² RFPs published for 272 LEO satellites and launch services. GOVSATCOM operational since January 2026.

GOVSATCOM

While IRIS² remains a construction project, GOVSATCOM is live infrastructure. The system went operational on Jan. 14, 2026, pooling capacity from eight satellites across five countries to provide secure communications for all EU member states. Cyprus completed the first operational use in March 2026.

GOVSATCOM is sovereign satellite communications operating today, serving real government users with classified and sensitive traffic. It proves that the EU institutional procurement model can deliver finished capability, not just issue contracts.

The Downstream Moat

The defense catalyst explains why Europe is spending. The downstream economy explains why it cannot stop.

Europe holds 19% of the global downstream space market, a position the ESA Space Economy Report valued at €408 billion in 2024. Precision agriculture in the Netherlands calibrates fertilizer application to Copernicus soil-moisture data. Mediterranean shipping routes are optimized on Galileo timing signals. German insurers price flood risk using satellite-derived elevation models updated quarterly. None of these users think of themselves as space customers. All of them would notice within weeks if the data stopped.

The Downstream Dependency Chain

LAUNCH

3 EU launches

in 2024

FRAGILE

→

SATELLITES

Galileo, Copernicus

IRIS², GOVSATCOM

→

DATA

GNSS, EO,

Comms, ISR

→

INDUSTRIES

  • Precision Agriculture
  • Maritime Navigation
  • Insurance & Finance
  • Aviation & Air Traffic

€408 billion

European downstream space market value (2024) — projected to double by 2033

If any link breaks, the economic exposure is hundreds of billions in annual productivity

GNSS and Earth observation revenues projected to grow from ~€260B (2023) to ~€590B by 2033.

The trajectory compounds the exposure. GNSS and Earth observation combined revenues are projected to nearly double, from roughly €260 billion in 2023 to approximately €590 billion by 2033, per the EUSPA Market Report. Those downstream revenues are already driving structural transformation in sectors like aviation, where Galileo, EGNOS, and Copernicus have become load-bearing infrastructure.

Key Insight

Europe is not investing in space to build a new industry. It is investing to protect the industries it already has.

The Launch Gap

This is where the thesis meets its honest test.

No European smallsat launcher has reached orbit. Not one. The constraint is not funding. It is experience. Building rockets that work requires building rockets that fail first, and Europe’s new launch companies are still in that early, expensive phase.

European SmallSat Launcher Status

COMPANY VEHICLE STATUS ORBITAL?
Isar Aerospace
GERMANY
Spectrum Flight 1 failed (Mar ’25)
Flight 2 scrubbed T-3s (Mar ’26)
×
Orbex
UK / SCOTLAND
Prime Insolvent (Feb ’26)
Ceased operations Feb 18, 2026
×
PLD Space
SPAIN
Miura 5 Targeting 2026 debut ×
Maia Space
FRANCE
Maia Delayed to 2027
Pushed from 2026 target (announced Feb ’26)
×
HyImpulse
GERMANY
SL1 Targeting 2026 debut ×

ZERO OPERATIONAL EUROPEAN SMALLSAT LAUNCHERS IN 2026

Isar Aerospace is the front-runner. Vehicles 3–7 in production. The company is raising €250M. European space employment reached 66,000 (per ESA), with an estimated 10,000+ NewSpace jobs created in seven years.

The defense demand signal changes the calculus. Commercial launch customers can wait for prices to drop or buy a rideshare slot on Falcon 9. Defense customers cannot. Sovereign launch requirements, by definition, require sovereign launchers. If European governments are serious about the constellations they have committed to, they need European rockets to deploy them.

That pull effect, institutional demand creating a guaranteed customer base for early-stage vehicles, is exactly how the U.S. launch industry matured. SpaceX’s early manifest was dominated by NASA and DoD contracts that covered development costs and tolerated early-program risk.

If the demand signal does not translate into launch contracts within 18 to 24 months, Europe concedes sovereign access to orbit. Not temporarily. Indefinitely.

The Open Questions

  • Procurement conversion: Can European defense budgets be converted into signed launch contracts within the 18-to-24 month window, or does the demand stall in bureaucracy?
  • Path of least resistance: Will sovereign mandates hold, or will defense agencies quietly buy SpaceX rideshare because it works today?
  • IRIS² execution: Can the SpaceRISE consortium manage competing national interests, or does consortium politics dilute the program?
  • Launcher maturation: Will at least one European smallsat launcher reach orbit before the procurement window closes?

Europe’s smallsat thesis runs on defense procurement, sovereign infrastructure mandates, and protection of a downstream economy generating hundreds of billions of euros annually.

The execution is behind. The launch gap is real. IRIS² may stumble on consortium politics. But the demand signal is institutional, contracted, and accelerating in a way that is structurally different from the models that produced a wave of SPAC collapses in the United States and geopolitically captive capacity in China.

The thesis does not need more money. It does not need more policy papers. It needs a European rocket to reach orbit, a procurement system that converts committed budgets into signed launch contracts, and the institutional discipline to do both before the window closes. Everything else is already in place. The open question is whether Europe treats this as an industrial program or a political aspiration. The difference will be visible from orbit.


Contact the Author

  • Mail

Filed Under: Featured, Uncategorized

Rocket Lab Emerging as Potential Bus Provider for 2,800-Satellite Equatys Constellation

March 25, 2026 by donmcgee

In the wake of Mobile World Congress 2026, industry speculation has intensified regarding a potential partnership between Rocket Lab (Nasdaq: RKLB) and Equatys, the newly detailed Direct-to-Device (D2D) joint venture between Viasat and Space42. The venture aims to deploy a massive LEO constellation of up to 2,800 satellites to provide seamless 3GPP-aligned connectivity to standard smartphones and IoT devices globally.

Reports from late March 2026 suggest that Rocket Lab is a primary candidate for the satellite bus manufacturing contract. Analysts point to Rocket Lab’s recent $1 billion capital raise as a potential strategic fund for an equity stake in the venture, mirroring its successful vertical integration strategy as a prime contractor for the U.S. Space Development Agency (SDA).

The Equatys ‘Space TowerCo’ Model

Announced in September 2025 and detailed in Barcelona on March 2, 2026, Equatys is designed as an independent, neutral infrastructure platform—an “industry-first space tower company.” The model allows multiple Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) to share the same LEO infrastructure, significantly reducing the capital expenditure (Capex) required for standalone D2D networks.

Space42, the UAE-based AI SpaceTech entity formed by the merger of Bayanat and Yahsat, has already committed $600 million in Capex for the 2026–2027 period to initiate the constellation’s build-out. The project leverages over 100 MHz of globally harmonized L- and S-band Mobile Satellite Services (MSS) spectrum held by Viasat and its partners.

Technical Specifications

The Equatys architecture is designed for “densification,” allowing the network to scale from an initial tactical layer to full global capacity without a fundamental redesign.

  • Constellation Size: Up to 2,800 satellites.
  • Orbits: 60 orbital planes across three distinct altitude layers.
  • Spectrum: L-band and S-band (3GPP Non-Terrestrial Network Release 17+).
  • Bus Platform: If awarded to Rocket Lab, the satellites would likely utilize the “Lightning” or “Photon” bus, tailored for high-cadence manufacturing.
  • Interoperability: Designed for automatic transition between terrestrial and satellite networks for billions of underserved users.

Executive Perspective

“Equatys is establishing an industry-first tower company model that can deliver the lowest unit cost of satellite capacity while preserving each partner’s spectrum rights,” said Mark Dankberg, CEO and Chairman of Viasat. “By sharing infrastructure, we can achieve ubiquitous, affordable, and scalable mobility for the entire ecosystem.”

“Demand for resilient, scalable, and affordable space systems continues to grow,” noted Peter Beck, CEO of Rocket Lab, in a recent update regarding the company’s SDA prime contracts. “Our vertically integrated approach isn’t just a competitive advantage—it’s enabling a fundamental shift in how large-scale constellations are executed.”

Commercial Rollout and Partnerships

While definitive agreements for the satellite bus have not yet been finalized, Equatys has already secured commercial momentum through MoUs with e& UAE and Telkomsat (Indonesia).

The roadmap targets an initial technical demonstration in late 2026, with a phased commercial rollout beginning in 2027. If Rocket Lab is confirmed as the bus provider, it would solidify the company’s transition from a launch specialist to a top-tier satellite prime for the world’s largest commercial LEO constellations.

Filed Under: Featured, Uncategorized

The Pentagon’s SmallSats Have An Amnesia Problem

March 20, 2026 by satnews

By Danny Sabour, VP of Sales and Marketing at Avalanche Technology Inc.

The aerospace and defense industry has universally accepted that the future of orbital superiority lies in proliferated, software-defined constellations. The mandate from the Space Development Agency (SDA), with support from the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), is clear: move away from vulnerable, exquisite “battlestars” and build agile, interconnected data networks in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). But while our architectural theory has evolved, the hardware foundation we are building it on is trapped in a dangerous compromise.

What Amnesia Looks Like at Mach 20

Consider a proliferated LEO constellation tasked with tracking hypersonic glide vehicles. In this architecture, raw infrared and radar data can’t be downlinked to a terrestrial station for processing. The latency alone would break the kill chain. The tracking, targeting, and handoff must be calculated autonomously, in real-time, on the satellite itself.

Now, introduce a contested environment. Whether it’s a directed energy attack, an electromagnetic pulse (EMP), or simply a severe solar weather event, power disruptions in orbit are an operational reality.

If that tracking satellite is relying on standard, charge-based memory for its in-situ processing, a momentary loss of power is catastrophic. The millisecond the power drops, the electrical charges dissipate. The satellite effectively wakes up with total amnesia. It must spend precious seconds, possibly minutes, rebooting, pulling its operating system from slower storage, recalibrating its star trackers, and attempting to reacquire the hypersonic target. By the time the node is back online, the threat has traveled hundreds of miles. The network has failed.

This isn’t a theoretical risk. Standard commercial silicon, whether Flash, SRAM, or DRAM, fundamentally relies on microscopic electrical charges to store data. In the high-radiation environment of orbit, these electrical states are inherently fragile, highly susceptible to bit flips and catastrophic latch-ups from cosmic rays. And yet this is exactly what we’re building proliferated constellations on.

The COTS Compromise: A Napkin Math Reality Check

To understand why the industry is making this hardware choice, and why it’s the wrong one, we have to do the system-level napkin math.

Consider a standard proliferated LEO constellation designed for a 5-year mission. To survive the Van Allen belts and solar weather, the SDA and prime contractors generally require components to withstand a Total Ionizing Dose (TID) of roughly 30 krad(Si).

Standard commercial memory (like SRAM) typically begins experiencing severe bit flips or failure between 5 and 10 krad. To bridge this gap, engineers take the “Careful COTS” middle road: they use the cheap commercial memory, but wrap it in shielding and implement Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR). Here is where the math destroys the economics of the SmallSat:

The TMR Power Tax: TMR dictates that you must use three identical memory chips to do the job of one, utilizing a “voting” circuit to correct radiation-induced bit flips. You’ve instantly tripled your memory component footprint and power draw.

The Volatility Tax: Standard SRAM is volatile. It requires a continuous flow of electricity just to hold data, plus extra processing power to constantly “scrub” the memory for errors.

The System-Level Cascade: On a satellite, power is a zero-sum game. As a general aerospace rule of thumb, every 1 Watt of continuous power draw requires roughly 2 to 4 Watts of total system overhead (including solar array sizing, battery mass, and power conditioning) to survive the eclipse phase of the orbit.

When you combine the tripled power draw of TMR, the constant electrical drain of volatile memory, and the physical weight of shielding, the compounded effects are severe. At current launch costs of thousands of dollars per kilogram, adding structural mass for larger batteries and heavy shielding entirely erases the upfront cost savings of using commercial silicon. Worse, every watt of power dedicated to keeping memory alive is a watt stolen from the primary payload.

The entire operational advantage of a proliferated architecture relies on optimizing Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP). If a contractor must dedicate a massive percentage of a SmallSat’s mass and power budget simply to prevent its memory from wiping itself, the agility of the constellation evaporates. We’re effectively putting heavy medieval armor on modern infantry and expecting them to sprint.

A Better Foundation

When we run this same math using a true Space-Grade, non-volatile architecture, the equation flips, but precision matters here. MRAM is a more modern and optimal alternative that overcomes these innate vulnerabilities seen in traditional legacy memories. However, not all STT-[1] MRAM is created equal. The magnetic memory cell itself is radiation-immune, storing data via a Magnetic Tunnel Junction rather than fragile electrical charges. But generic industrial MRAM still carries radiation-vulnerable support circuitry: the read/write logic, power delivery, and peripheral circuits that can fail just as readily as any other chip under particle bombardment. The difference with a purpose-built Space Grade device is that TMR is integrated directly into the logic on the die at the deep submicron level, and the power delivery circuitry is hardened as well. Error detection and correction (EDAC) functionality is built in. The system integrator doesn’t add any of that externally. It’s already solved at the component level.

The result: no external TMR boards, no bolt-on shielding, no battery backup for volatile states. And because the memory itself is non-volatile, it draws zero power at rest. By avoiding the “Careful COTS” compromise and choosing a memory architecture where radiation hardening is a feature of the chip rather than a burden on the system designer, satellite engineers aren’t just buying better memory. They’re buying back critical mass, power, and engineering margin for the mission.

And the satellite that loses power in a contested environment? When data is stored via magnetic states rather than trapped electrons, the system is immune to power-loss amnesia. If power drops, the data is frozen in place. When power is restored, the system experiences “instant-on” recovery, picking up the tracking algorithm exactly where it left off. No reboot. No recalibration. No lost target.

A New Foundation for Orbital Superiority

The Department of Defense’s vision for a proliferated, AI-driven Hybrid Space Architecture is the correct path forward for national security. But we can’t achieve next-generation orbital superiority using last-generation terrestrial hardware compromises.

Continuing to force fragile, charge-based memory into the hostile environment of space and attempting to mitigate the inevitable failures with heavy shielding or redundant software is a losing battle against physics and SWaP constraints. To build true “data centers in space” that can process hypersonic threats in real-time and survive contested environments, the aerospace industry must adopt a new hardware baseline.

We must transition to inherently radiation-immune, non-volatile memory architectures from the ground up. While many technologies claim to be “Space Grade”, it requires that 5 objective criteria be met simultaneously. Space Grade memory must:

1️⃣ Survive radiation without disruption

2️⃣ Retain data for the full mission lifetime

3️⃣ Endure unlimited writes

4️⃣ Commit data instantly with non-volatile persistence

5️⃣ Demonstrate real space heritage

The afforded resilience and adaptability from employing truly Space Grade MRAM also happens to provide the most elegant hardware and software framework for enduring innovation. Only by building on an uncompromising foundation can we deliver the processing density of commercial silicon with the absolute reliability required for national security. It’s time to cut the terrestrial cord and deploy autonomous constellations that don’t merely survive the modern space domain but dominate it.


Danny Sabour is VP of Sales and Marketing at Avalanche Technology Inc., which manufactures Space Grade STT-MRAM. Avalanche’s devices integrate TMR, EDAC, and radiation-hardened power delivery on-die, achieving an SEU threshold 84 times higher than Flash and an expected time to first event in LEO of 500 years. Learn more at avalanche-technology.com.

Filed Under: Featured, News, Uncategorized

NewSpace Systems Opens Africa’s Largest Commercial Space Hardware Manufacturing Facility

March 19, 2026 by donmcgee

On Thursday, March 19, 2026, NewSpace Systems (NSS) officially opened its new 5,200 m² manufacturing hub in Somerset West, South Africa. The facility is now the largest commercial space component and sub-systems manufacturing site on the African continent, significantly expanding the region’s capacity to support the global satellite supply chain.

The purpose-built facility is designed to meet the high-volume production requirements of modern satellite constellations. As Africa’s largest exporter of space-utilized hardware, NSS currently supports the majority of commercial spacecraft manufacturers globally, including several blue-chip companies with constellations exceeding 500 satellites.

Context: Scaling for Global Constellation Demand

The expansion marks a major milestone in NSS’s transition from a specialized component provider to a high-cadence industrial manufacturer. Since breaking ground on the advanced facility in October 2024, the company has focused on scaling its Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) product lines.

NSS’s growth has been fueled by the rapid expansion of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) constellations, which require flight-proven hardware that can be produced at scale without compromising on quality. The company’s products, ranging from sun sensors to reaction wheels, currently fly on spacecraft weighing up to six tons.

Technical Specifications and Infrastructure

The new Somerset West hub features one of the most advanced commercial cleanrooms in the Southern Hemisphere, engineered to meet stringent IPC and ECSS aerospace standards.

  • Total Footprint: 5,200 m² of operational space.
  • Cleanroom: 1,260 m² state-of-the-art facility (ISO 14644-1 certified).
  • Laboratories: 120 m² dedicated engineering lab for R&D.
  • Specialized Zones: Helmholtz coil calibration areas for magnetically sensitive hardware, dark rooms for optical testing, and thermal/vibration testing zones.
  • Production Environment: 6S LEAN-certified assembly lines for repeatable, high-precision manufacturing.

“Big, beautiful, and built for space manufacturing,” said Tanya Lerm, CEO of NewSpace Systems. “Every corner of this cleanroom reflects our commitment to quality, reliability, and mission success. From the controlled air environment to the precision our customers demand, every aspect of this facility was engineered to deliver hardware that performs flawlessly in space.”

Integration and Quality Assurance

By consolidating design, qualification, and manufacturing under one roof, NSS maintains vertical integration that allows for competitive pricing while adhering to the highest international standards. The company is currently upgrading its digital systems to enhance data visibility and operational efficiency across its global offices in the U.S., UK, and New Zealand.

TVAC Testing and Future Innovation

Following the successful opening of phase one, NSS plans to integrate Thermal Vacuum (TVAC) testing capabilities into the facility shortly. This will allow for end-to-end environmental qualification on-site. The company is also developing its next generation of intelligent subsystems, which will feature built-in diagnostics and AI-driven capabilities to meet the evolving requirements of the 2027-2030 launch manifest.

Filed Under: Featured, News

Telesat Optimizes Lightspeed Constellation with Dedicated Military Ka-Band Spectrum

March 18, 2026 by donmcgee

On Tuesday, March 17, 2026, Telesat (Nasdaq and TSX: TSAT) announced a major strategic update to its Lightspeed Low Earth Orbit (LEO) constellation, adding 500 MHz of military Ka-band (Mil-Ka) spectrum to its initial 156 satellites. The decision, revealed during the company’s Q4 2025 earnings call, targets the surging demand from NATO and allied defense departments for secure, sovereign, and interoperable communications.

The reallocation represents 25% of the total spectrum on which Lightspeed will operate. Because the Mil-Ka frequencies are immediately adjacent to the constellation’s existing commercial Ka-band, Telesat confirmed the change will not impact the deployment schedule and carries a modest incremental cost of approximately $25 million—less than 0.5% of the total program budget.

Strategic Pivot to Sovereign Defense

The move signals Telesat’s aggressive pursuit of the “Sovereign-Commercial Nexus,” where commercial LEO networks are increasingly integrated into national defense architectures. This shift is highlighted by Telesat Government Solutions’ recent award in February 2026 under the U.S. Missile Defense Agency’s $151 billion SHIELD IDIQ program.

By dedicating 500 MHz to Mil-Ka, Telesat is positioning Lightspeed as a LEO-based alternative or supplement to traditional Geostationary (GEO) Mil-Ka systems, which allied governments have historically relied upon for mission-critical command and control.

Technical Implementation and Hardware Compatibility

The integration of Mil-Ka spectrum will specifically replace an equivalent amount of commercial Ka-band on the user link, while the gateway links remain unaffected.

  • Spectrum Reallocation: 500 MHz of dedicated Mil-Ka.
  • Compatibility: Designed for interoperability with national networks, enabling coalition partners to maintain shared mission-critical connectivity.
  • User Terminals: Military-compatible terminals, including the ALL.SPACE multi-orbit terminals currently under collaboration, will be available concurrently with commercial hardware at service commencement.

Schedule Adjustments and ASIC Development

Despite the spectrum change not affecting the timeline, Telesat did announce a slight delay in its overall global commercial service launch. Initially expected by late 2027, the company now targets Q1 2028 for full global service.

The three-month shift is attributed to the development timeline for the SatixFy Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) that power the satellite payloads. Following MDA Space’s acquisition of SatixFy’s digital payload division, Telesat noted that MDA has significantly bolstered the technical resources available to finalize the chip design.

“The addition of Mil-Ka to Telesat Lightspeed will result in a substantial increase to the current global supply of Mil-Ka capacity,” said Dan Goldberg, Telesat’s President and CEO. “By integrating it with the already highly advanced Telesat Lightspeed network, the Telesat Mil-Ka capability is expected to have meaningfully superior performance characteristics relative to the Mil-Ka platforms that allied governments have historically relied upon.”

Timeline to Orbit

The launch cadence for Telesat Lightspeed remains on track for a high-intensity deployment cycle:

  • December 2026: Launch of the first two production satellites.
  • Throughout 2027: High-cadence launch schedule with a target of 96 satellites in orbit by year-end.
  • Q1 2028: Commencement of full global commercial and military service.

Filed Under: Featured, Uncategorized

Kepler Commissions First NVIDIA-Powered “Cloud Infrastructure” Across Optical Constellation

March 17, 2026 by donmcgee

Kepler Communications announced the successful commissioning of distributed on-orbit computing across its Tranche 1 optical data relay constellation on Monday, March 16, 2026. This milestone transitions Kepler’s network from a high-speed data transport layer into a scalable, cloud-native processing environment, allowing customers to execute AI-driven workloads directly in orbit rather than relying on ground-based data centers.

The Hardware of Orbital AI

The “Kepler Compute” fabric is powered by 40 NVIDIA Jetson Orin modules, deployed as distributed edge GPUs across the ten satellites that make up the Tranche 1 “Aether” series. By integrating these modules with SDA-compatible optical inter-satellite links (OISLs), Kepler has created a decentralized compute cluster where workloads can scale dynamically across the constellation.

Component Specification
Compute Units 40x NVIDIA Jetson Orin Modules (4 per satellite)
Storage Terabytes of SSD-based onboard storage
Connectivity Real-time Optical Mesh (SDA & ESTOL compatible)
Architecture IP-based decentralized edge fabric
Deployment 10 Satellites (Tranche 1)

Overcoming the Downlink Bottleneck

Traditionally, Earth Observation (EO) and Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) operators have been limited by “downlink latency”—the hours-long wait for a satellite to pass over a ground station to dump raw data. By running NVIDIA CUDA-accelerated AI models directly on Kepler’s satellites, mission operators can perform:

  • Real-time Detection: Automated identification of wildfires, maritime anomalies, or military movements.
  • Data Optimization: Thinning massive imagery archives to transmit only “actionable pixels” to the ground.
  • Autonomous Tasking: Using on-orbit insights to automatically retask sensors without human intervention.

Strategic Context and Constellation Growth

The commissioning follows the successful January 2026 launch of the Tranche 1 satellites aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9. This deployment marks Kepler’s shift from technology pathfinders to a fully operational commercial network. The architecture is designed for high resiliency; if an individual satellite node becomes unavailable, the network’s software-defined routing can shift compute tasks to other nodes in the ring to maintain service continuity.

“By leveraging NVIDIA AI infrastructure in our optical network, data can be processed, routed, and acted on in orbit rather than waiting to return to Earth,” said Mina Mitry, CEO and co-founder of Kepler. “As we extend the scale of our infrastructure, this becomes a natural extension of terrestrial computing, enabling faster decision-making and new mission architectures.”

Tranche 2 and 100-Gigabit Links

Kepler plans to launch additional tranches every two years, with Tranche 2 scheduled for early 2028. Future tranches will introduce 100-gigabit optical technology and increased GPU density to support the growing demand for “Orbital Data Centers” (ODCs). This roadmap aligns with Kepler’s ongoing partnership with Axiom Space, which seeks to operationalize large-scale data processing for the first commercial modules of the Axiom Station.

Filed Under: Featured, News

Kepler Communications Names NanoAvionics as Preferred European Bus Provider for Optical Relay Missions

February 17, 2026 by editorial

On February 17, 2026, Kepler Communications announced the selection of Kongsberg NanoAvionics (“NanoAvionics”) as its preferred European satellite bus provider for upcoming hosted payload initiatives.

The partnership targets spacecraft with a mass of up to 500kg and focuses on integrating NanoAvionics’ platforms with The Kepler Network to provide satellite operators with real-time optical connectivity and on-orbit compute services.

Strategic Alignment and The Kepler Network

The agreement follows the successful SpaceX ‘Twilight’ mission on January 11, 2026, which deployed the first tranche of Kepler’s optical relay satellites. This partnership aims to simplify the adoption of optical communications by utilizing U.S. Space Development Agency (SDA) standards for secure, interoperable data transfer. Under the terms of the deal, NanoAvionics will offer Kepler’s optical data relay and edge computing services as an optional feature within its portfolio of inter-satellite link solutions.

Technical Specifications for Optical Inter-Satellite Links

The collaboration will initially focus on the MP42 microsatellite platform before expanding to NanoAvionics’ CubeSat lines. Key performance metrics for the integrated systems include:

  • Throughput: Connectivity speeds of up to 2.5 Gbps.
  • Latency: Near-real-time, sub-second data transport.
  • Data Volume: Capacity to handle terabytes of data per day.
  • Interoperability: Full alignment with SDA optical communication terminal standards.

Executive Commentary

“NanoAvionics has earned a reputation for being one of the most reliable bus providers, helping customers with demanding mission requirements scale quickly and with confidence,” said Mina Mitry, CEO and Co-Founder of Kepler Communications. “By integrating our optical network and on-orbit compute services with NanoAvionics’ platforms, we are enabling the transformation of space from a store-and-forward model to a responsive environment.“

Atle Wøllo, CEO of NanoAvionics, added: “Through this cooperation with Kepler, we are positioning NanoAvionics at the forefront of the industry’s adoption of optical communications. This industry-wide move can provide an exponential boost for sovereign national security missions and for commercial operators serving time-sensitive data.“

Timeline for Initial Operating Capability

The partnership comes as Kepler moves toward Initial Operating Capability (IOC) for its optical network in early 2026. As the network scales to 100 Gbps-class capacity with future tranches, NanoAvionics is positioned for priority access to these higher data rates. The combined offering is designed to meet the increasing demand for high-bandwidth, low-latency communications and on-orbit edge processing, allowing operators to run artificial intelligence and machine learning models directly in space.

Filed Under: Featured, News

The Hybrid Architecture Is No Longer Theoretical

February 12, 2026 by editorial

By Abbey White, Staff Writer, SatNews

Dispatch from SmallSat Symposium. Coverage and analysis from across the conference, tracking the forces shaping the next phase of the SmallSat market.

MOUNTAIN VIEW — If there was any doubt that the center of gravity in the commercial space sector has shifted from venture capital speculation to kinetic necessity, that doubt was shattered by the final session, Smallsats at the Tactical Edge – Hybrid ISR and Defense Integration. SmallSat Symposium this year was no longer about democratization for the sake of access. It is about survival, deterrence, and the industrialization of the kill chain.

The session’s panelists—representing the bleeding edge of propulsion, sensing, and compute—made one thing clear: Any distinction between a commercial satellite and a military asset has effectively evaporated.

The Department of War Reality

The rhetorical shift was immediate and jarring. Throughout the session, speakers abandoned the polite euphemism of defense in favor of a blunter reality.

“The Department of War? Doesn’t just roll off the tongue,” Impulse Space President Eric Romo remarked, acknowledging the strange bedfellows of Silicon Valley innovation and lethal force. Yet Romo admitted that the Pentagon is where the industry’s traction lies. This is not a reluctant partnership, but a necessary fusion driven by the Space Development Agency and its spiral development cycles, which have forced a terrifying pace on an industry used to moving slow.

The mandate is integration prior to crisis. Gone are the days when commercial space acted merely as a break-glass emergency backup for bandwidth surges. Commercial sensors are now weaving inextricably into the operational fabric before the first shot is fired.

Decision Superiority, Not Just Data

The panel dismantled the legacy obsession with resolution and bandwidth. In a contested environment, a pretty picture is useless if it arrives twenty minutes late. The new currency is latency.

Mark Gombo of HawkEye 360, a former Marine electronic warfare officer, cut through the technical noise. “I submit that it’s more about decision superiority,” Gombo argued. “It is the decision space to understand what’s going on.”

This aligns perfectly with the tactical realities seen in Ukraine and Gaza, where commercial signals are jammed and logistics chains are hunted by AI-enabled sensors. The objective is no longer to hoard terabytes of data, but to deliver a target track to a weapon system.

Jonny Dyer, CEO of Muon Space, reinforced this urgency, noting that whether tracking wildfires for first responders or missile trucks for the SDA, the requirement is identical: “We really have to rethink how we architect a lot of these core systems to enable what I think is really ultimately a latency driven requirement.”

The Friction of Space Compute

Despite the unity on mission, the panel fractured over the how. A sharp disagreement emerged regarding the role of edge computing and specifically whether to process data on the satellite or on the ground.

Jeff Janicik, CEO of Innoflight, championed the need for trusted, high-assurance on-orbit computing. To close the latency gap, he stipulated, the decision loop must move to space. “We all know that we can, if we can take the decision making and all the data collection and data fusion that is currently happening on the ground, bring it into the space,” Janicik claimed. The barrier is not the processor, he emphasized, but the trust required to let an AI make a decision that could trigger a kinetic effect.

Dyer was less convinced. In a moment of refreshing candor that typified the session, he pushed back against the industry obsession with putting data centers in orbit.

“I might be the outlier on this panel, but I just don’t think space compute’s that interesting of an idea,” Dyer said. “Ultimately, we shouldn’t care where processing is being done.”

Dyer’s skepticism highlights a critical engineering tension. Launching high-power GPUs into orbit creates massive thermal management headaches, a point reinforced by research on Andy Kwas’s work at Northrop Grumman. If the communications link is fat enough, processing on the ground is cheaper and easier. The satellites, Dyer argued, should look like a data center rack, but the software must be agnostic.

The Debris Euphemism

The most telling exchange occurred when moderator Andy Kwas raised the topic of debris removal and the recent DIU solicitation for de-orbiting unprepared satellites. In the polite society of civil space, this is an environmental discussion. In the context of a hybrid space war, it is a discussion about clearing lanes and neutralizing threats.

Romo stripped away the pretense entirely, asking the room, “Does anybody actually believe that that’s about space debris?”

The laughter was nervous but knowing. Janicik concurred, noting that right now the Department of War would be more focused on fighting through it.

The implication is heavy. Technologies developed for active debris removal are dual-use. If you can grab a dead satellite to de-orbit it, then you can grab a live adversary satellite to disable it. The industry is building ASAT capabilities under the guise of environmental stewardship, and everyone in the room knows it.

Are We Actually Ahead?

For all the bravado about American innovation, the panel ended on a note of strategic anxiety. When asked if the United States maintains superiority over peer adversaries, the answers were mixed.

Gombo was confident: “Absolutely.”

Romo, conversely, pointed to the lack of situational awareness in higher orbits, specifically Geostationary Orbit where critical national assets reside.

“I’m not so sure that—for battlefield awareness in the battlefield of GEO and probably MEO as well—that we actually are ahead,” Romo warned. He cited Chinese RPO-capable spacecraft performing inspection loops around U.S. assets with little public response.

The Bottom Line

The SmallSat Symposium has evolved. The New Space optimism of the past decade has hardened into a cold, pragmatic focus on national security. The validated gaps are lethal, the customers are wearing uniforms, and the companies that survive will not be the ones with the best PowerPoint slides. They will be the ones that can plug directly into a classified network and help a commander win a fight.

As Gombo bluntly advised the room: “If you bring me a capability that’s not on my gap list, you’re just bringing me another rock. And I don’t need any more rocks.”

Filed Under: Featured, News

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 60
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019

© 2019–2026 SatNews

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.
      x
      Sign Up Now!

      Enjoy a free weekly newsletter with recent headlines from the global SmallSat industry.

      Invalid email address
      We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
      Thanks for subscribing! You will now receive weekly SmallSat News updates.
      We love our advertisers.
      And you will too!

      Please disable Ad Blocker to continue... We promise to keep it unobtrusive.
      We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
      Invalid email address
      Thanks for subscribing!